Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Following months of anticipation, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) unveiled their new Merger Guidelines (the Guidelines) on Dec. 18, 2023. More than 30,000 stakeholders offered input on proposed changes to the Guidelines, which were previously updated in 2010. While the agencies made some modifications in response to public comment, the core elements of the final Guidelines are consistent with the draft version released in July 2023.
Promising sharper scrutiny of mergers and acquisitions, the new Guidelines formalize the Biden administration's interventionist approach to enforcement and represent the culmination of its efforts to revamp antitrust policy. Indeed, the theme of modernization pervaded the agencies' remarks upon release — FTC Chair Lina Khan declared that the Guidelines "reflect the new realities of how firms do business in the modern economy," while Attorney General Merrick Garland asserted that they protect Americans from "the ways in which unlawful, anticompetitive practices manifest themselves in our modern economy" (Press Release, Federal Trade Commission, "Federal Trade Commission and Justice Department Release 2023 Merger Guidelines" (Dec. 18, 2023)). From loosened structural presumptions to unconventional theories of harm such as "ecosystem competition" to consideration of a merger's effects on outside markets, we review some of the most noteworthy changes in the new Guidelines.
|The Guidelines are structured around 11 principles that underlie the "frameworks" by which the agencies will assess whether to challenge a transaction. Although many of the Guidelines incorporate well-established tenets of antitrust law — the Guidelines recognize, for example, that both horizontal and vertical mergers may be anticompetitive — some of the new frameworks starkly depart from the past four decades of federal antitrust enforcement. Ultimately, the Guidelines reflect the increasingly aggressive attitude to antitrust enforcement that currently prevails both in the United States and abroad.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.