Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
U.S. Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Whether Copyright Plaintiffs Can Reach Back More Than Three Years for Infringement Damages
Under §507(b) of the U.S. Copyright Act, the statute of limitations for filing a copyright action is that it must be filed within three years of a claim accruing. It was a case of first impression for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, "that has divided our sister courts" the Eleventh Circuit noted, in deciding that a copyright plaintiff may recover damages that occur more than three years before a copyright lawsuit is filed. Nealy v. Warner Chappell Music Inc., 60 F.4th 1325 (11th Cir. 2023).
The Nealy litigation arose out of a copyright infringement action brought by music producer Sherman Nealy against Warner Chappell Music and Artist Publishing Group. The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 21, 2024, when the justices heard oral arguments in Warner Chappell Music Inc. v. Nealy, 22-1078, due to a conflict among the circuit courts over the interplay between the case-filing statute of limitations in §507(b) and copyright damages.
The Eleventh Circuit's Nealy ruling had aligned with the Ninth Circuit's view in Starz Entertainment LLC v. MGM Domestic Television Distribution LLC, 39 F.4th 1236 (9th Cir. 2022), which conflicts with the Second Circuit's view that copyright damages are limited by the three-year statute of limitations. See, Sohm v. Scholastic Inc., 959 F.3d 39 (2d Cir. 2020).
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?