Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bit Parts
Amazon Didn't Exceed Scope of License to Stream Chinese Drama
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Amazon didn't exceed the scope of a license to stream the Chinese TV drama General and I on the Warner Bros.' DramaFever channel on Amazon Prime. Wanjuan Media (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. v. Amazon.com Inc., 22-CV-1434. The Chinese company Wanjuan Media had executed a joint-production agreement with Shanghai Croton Culture Media, which later entered into a non-exclusive agreement with DramaFever for General and I to be distributed online "on DramaFever Platforms," including on Amazon Prime. But Warner Bros. shut down the DramaFever channel in 2018. In 2022, Wanjuan Media sued Amazon for copyright infringement, alleging "certain screenshots and other evidence 'suggest that it is possible that Amazon was still streaming' [General and I] in November 2020, and even perhaps 'as late as October 2021.'" District Judge J. Paul Oetken granted summary judgment for Amazon, noting: "There is no hard evidence that Amazon streamed the show after October 2018 or that it discontinued streaming only after Wanjuan's cease-and-desist notice. Screenshots of the 'General and I' product detail page, taken on August 3, 2021, and submitted into the record by Wanjuan, clearly indicate that '[t]his video is currently unavailable.'"
*****
California Talent Agency's Lawsuit in Texas Won't Be Stayed Pending Proceeding Before California Labor Commissioner
The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, adopted a federal magistrate's recommendation that a dispute between California-based A3 Artists Agency and the Austin-based management company Night Media should be initially heard by the California Labor Commissioner under the California Talent Agencies Act (TAA), Calif. Labor §1700 et seq. A3 claims in part that Night Media acted as an unlicensed talent agent that lured an artist away from A3. In his ruling dismissing A3's claims without prejudice, District Judge Robert Pitman noted A3 "argues that even if this Court were to find that its claims should be presented to the California Labor Commissioner, the appropriate remedy would be to stay this case pending adjudication of those claims, rather than dismissing the claims." But the district judge added: "A3 has not persuasively argued what hardship it would face if this action were to be dismissed without prejudice as opposed to stayed. Instead, it appears that a stay would compromise judicial economy by indefinitely delaying the resolution of this case while A3 pursues its administrative remedies."
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?