Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FCPA Compliance Guidance for Global Businesses
On March 7, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new whistleblower reward program intended to help prosecutors bring more foreign corruption cases. Under the new program, individuals who report corporate misconduct can earn a share of any resulting DOJ forfeiture. This comes on the heels of one of the world's largest commodity trading firms agreeing to pay about $661 million after admitting to bribing Ecuadorean officials. These events reinforce anti-bribery and corruption laws as one of the significant compliance risks that companies face in an increasingly competitive global marketplace.
The Biden administration and its Justice Department have established countering corruption as a core U.S. national security interest, highlighting the threat that global corruption poses to prosperity, competition, and democracy. Violations in 2023 continued to rebound from their COVID slump, with approximately $770 million in fines, penalties, and disgorgement. That trajectory is expected to continue through 2024 and beyond. While companies competing for new markets grapple with surging tariffs, sanctions, and other trade restrictions, the risk of failing to implement compliance programs can increase as well.
Companies with any international operations should ensure they have a robust written policy and compliance program focused on anti-bribery and corruption. Compliance risk touches nearly all industries, including materials, industrials, financials, health care, consumer services, energy, and information technology. This is especially true where companies have foreign subsidiaries or engage third parties in foreign countries for sales, consulting, and other activities.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Role and Responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?