Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Seventh Circuit Applies Safe Harbor to Private Securities Transaction

By Michael L. Cook
April 01, 2024

"… [T]he term 'securities contract' as used in [Bankruptcy Code] §546(e) unambiguously includes contracts involving privately held securities." Petr v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A., (In re BWGS, LLC), 2024 WL 113217, *6 (7th Cir. Mar. 15, 2024). Affirming the district court's reversal of the bankruptcy court, the court also held that "§546(e) preempts" the bankruptcy trustee's "proffered" state law fraudulent transfer claims. Id. at *10.

Facts

The Chapter 7 trustee here sued the acquiror and the lending bank, but not the selling shareholders, in connection with the failed leveraged buyout (LBO) of the target debtor. The defendant bank here had initially financed the acquiror's purchase of the target debtor's stock under a stock purchase agreement with a "bridge loan." The acquiror guaranteed payment of the bridge loan. "[L]ess than one month after acquisition," the defendant bank's bridge loan was repaid with funds from two new lenders who now had claims against the debtor, presumably secured by the debtor's assets. The court called this bridge loan repayment to the defendant bank the "Transfer" which also "relieved the acquiror of any obligations under the Bridge Loan." Id. at *1-*2. The debtor, of course, "received no value from the Transfer," but was indebted to the new lenders – the classic LBO. "The essence of a leveraged buyout is that investors "buy out" existing stockholders of a target company with mostly borrowed money (the "leverage"), and use the target's own assets to "secure the debt [guaranteeing or assuming] the debt to the lenders." Chas. J. Tabb, Law of Bankruptcy §6.37, at 439 (Foundation Press, 1997). The trustee sought in the bankruptcy court avoidance of the Transfer plus recovery of "its value from either" the defendant bank or the acquiror. Id. at *2.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.