Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Seventh Circuit Applies Safe Harbor to Private Securities Transaction

By Michael L. Cook
April 01, 2024

"… [T]he term 'securities contract' as used in [Bankruptcy Code] §546(e) unambiguously includes contracts involving privately held securities." Petr v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A., (In re BWGS, LLC), 2024 WL 113217, *6 (7th Cir. Mar. 15, 2024). Affirming the district court's reversal of the bankruptcy court, the court also held that "§546(e) preempts" the bankruptcy trustee's "proffered" state law fraudulent transfer claims. Id. at *10.

Facts

The Chapter 7 trustee here sued the acquiror and the lending bank, but not the selling shareholders, in connection with the failed leveraged buyout (LBO) of the target debtor. The defendant bank here had initially financed the acquiror's purchase of the target debtor's stock under a stock purchase agreement with a "bridge loan." The acquiror guaranteed payment of the bridge loan. "[L]ess than one month after acquisition," the defendant bank's bridge loan was repaid with funds from two new lenders who now had claims against the debtor, presumably secured by the debtor's assets. The court called this bridge loan repayment to the defendant bank the "Transfer" which also "relieved the acquiror of any obligations under the Bridge Loan." Id. at *1-*2. The debtor, of course, "received no value from the Transfer," but was indebted to the new lenders – the classic LBO. "The essence of a leveraged buyout is that investors "buy out" existing stockholders of a target company with mostly borrowed money (the "leverage"), and use the target's own assets to "secure the debt [guaranteeing or assuming] the debt to the lenders." Chas. J. Tabb, Law of Bankruptcy §6.37, at 439 (Foundation Press, 1997). The trustee sought in the bankruptcy court avoidance of the Transfer plus recovery of "its value from either" the defendant bank or the acquiror. Id. at *2.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.