Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In our article in the October 2022 issue, we discussed NYC Administrative Code §22-1005 (the Guaranty Law), which, under certain conditions, cancelled the obligations of guarantors of commercial leases. This article discusses the recent developments surrounding the constitutionality of the statute. In particular, we address the Southern District's view that the Guaranty Law is unconstitutional and the splintered view of the statute's constitutionality expressed by New York State courts.
In Melendez v. City of New York, 503 F.Supp.3d 13 (S.D.N.Y. 2020), a group of landlords sued the City of New York in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for a declaration that the Guaranty Law was unconstitutional under the Contracts Clause of the Federal Constitution. On Nov. 25, 2020, the District Court issued a decision upholding the Guaranty Law against constitutional challenges. See, id. The District Court's decision was appealed to the Second Circuit. On appeal, the Second Circuit identified serious concerns about the Guaranty Law being a "reasonable and appropriate" means to serve the City of New York's proffered purpose — to help shuttered businesses survive the pandemic. Melendez v. City of New York, 16 F.4th 99, 1038–47 (2d Cir. 2021). Accordingly, the Second Circuit vacated the dismissal and remanded the action back to the District Court for further proceedings.
On remand, the District Court evaluated the constitutionality of the Guaranty Law according to the guidelines set forth in Sullivan v. Nassau Cty. Interim Fin. Auth., 959 F.3d 54 (2d Cir. 2020), asking: "(1) whether the contractual impairment is substantial and, if so, (2) whether the law serves a legitimate public purpose such as remedying a general social or economic problem and, if such purpose is demonstrated, (3) whether the means chosen to accomplish this purpose are reasonable and necessary." Melendez v. City of New York, 668 F.Supp.3d 184, 187 (S.D.N.Y. 2023).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.