Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistFeaturesBankruptcyLitigation

Delaware District Court Could Guide Supreme Court Purdue Pharma Decision

By Michael L. Cook
May 01, 2024

A bankruptcy court properly held that derivative claims based on "piercing the corporate veil theory of liability [were] released under" a confirmed reorganization plan, but that direct "claims for negligent undertaking" were not released and "could be asserted" in state court against the debtors' equity sponsors (Sponsors). In re Port Neches Fuels, LLC, 2024 WL 1298590, *1 (D. Del. Mar. 27, 2024). The confirmed plan, affirmed by the district court, had released "any and all claims … (including any derivative claims, asserted or assertable on behalf of the Debtors [and] the Reorganized Debtors … against certain released parties," including the Sponsors. When plaintiffs sued the Sponsors in Texas state court, the defendants asked the bankruptcy court to "enforce the plan, arguing that the plaintiffs' claims were based on piercing the corporate veil theory of liability, that any such claims belonged to the Debtors' estates, and accordingly those claims were released under the plan." Id.

|

Relevance

The U.S. Supreme Court will "soon, likely before its summer break … render an opinion in … [Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., (Case No. 23-124) ((argued Dec. 4, 2023)]." Brian Shaw and David Doyle, "How Purdue Pharma High Court Case May Change Bankruptcy," LAW 360, April 3, 2024. According to Messrs. Shaw and Doyle, the Court's decision "may be the death of most third-party releases in Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases," like the one in Port Neches. Id. As shown below, this fear may be overwrought.

The Port Neches decision, supported by a superb bankruptcy court opinion, In re TPC Group Inc., 2023 WL 2 1 6 8045 (Bankr. D. Del. Feb. 22 2023) (Goldblatt, B.J.), provides a sensible, balanced response and a way to resolve the Purdue issue. The issues here are not about the insiders' conduct and not about third party releases generally. The issue here is about who owns direct, particularized claims. In fact, the district court in the Purdue case, 635 B.R. 26 (S.D.N.Y. 1021), provided an analysis similar to that in Port Neches. The Purdue decision, ostensibly based on statutory construction, could have enabled the reorganization plan to be confirmed without releases of direct claims but with the insiders' increasing their contribution from $4.3 billion to roughly $6 billion, as they actually did after the district court decision was rendered. See, In re Purdue Pharma L.P., 69 F.4th 45, 62 (2d Cir. 2023). Most significant, in the Purdue case no party ultimately challenged the third party releases for the debtor's derivative claims. As the Purdue district court stressed, the bankruptcy court had "undoubted jurisdiction" over derivative claims, 635 B.R. at 37, but lacked "the statutory authority to impose" the release of "particularized or direct claims." Id. at 36. In Port Neches, the analysis was even simpler: the debtors' estate did not own any direct third party claims to the extent they existed. The non-debtor plaintiffs owned those claims.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.