Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Though it has been on the books for over two decades, the Illinois Genetic Information Privacy Act (GIPA) has recently gathered steam; over 40 class actions were filed in 2023 alone.
At its core, GIPA regulates the collection and use of genetic information by employers, employment agencies, labor organizations, licensing agencies, and other entities. According to recent GIPA class-action suits, the mandating of pre-employment physicals or health interviews required potential employees to improperly disclose their family medical history as a condition of employment. GIPA litigation remains in its early stages, but the possibility of exorbitant statutory damages — $2,500 per negligent violation, up to $15,000 per intentional or reckless violation — could make GIPA the next major trend in privacy class action litigation.
|The Illinois legislature first enacted GIPA in 1998. The act was then amended in 2008, in part, in response to the enactment of its federal counterpart — the Federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA). The 2008 GIPA amendment adopted GINA's definition of "genetic information," which includes: an individual's genetic tests; genetic tests of family members of an individual; the manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of such individual; or the request or receipt of genetic services or participation in the clinical research which includes genetic services, by an individual or their family member. Excluded from the definition is information about the sex or age of the individual. Notably, the inclusion of the "manifestation of disease or disorder in family members" as an individual's "genetic information" broadens the reach of the statute; it thus extends far beyond a medical or health care setting.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.