Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Though it has been on the books for over two decades, the Illinois Genetic Information Privacy Act (GIPA) has recently gathered steam; over 40 class actions were filed in 2023 alone.
At its core, GIPA regulates the collection and use of genetic information by employers, employment agencies, labor organizations, licensing agencies, and other entities. According to recent GIPA class-action suits, the mandating of pre-employment physicals or health interviews required potential employees to improperly disclose their family medical history as a condition of employment. GIPA litigation remains in its early stages, but the possibility of exorbitant statutory damages — $2,500 per negligent violation, up to $15,000 per intentional or reckless violation — could make GIPA the next major trend in privacy class action litigation.
The Illinois legislature first enacted GIPA in 1998. The act was then amended in 2008, in part, in response to the enactment of its federal counterpart — the Federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA). The 2008 GIPA amendment adopted GINA's definition of "genetic information," which includes: an individual's genetic tests; genetic tests of family members of an individual; the manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of such individual; or the request or receipt of genetic services or participation in the clinical research which includes genetic services, by an individual or their family member. Excluded from the definition is information about the sex or age of the individual. Notably, the inclusion of the "manifestation of disease or disorder in family members" as an individual's "genetic information" broadens the reach of the statute; it thus extends far beyond a medical or health care setting.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.