Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
7 Recommendations for Social Media Influencers and Companies to Protect Themselves Against Copyright Issues
In recent years, the advent of the social media "influencer" has revolutionized advertising. Companies often partner with influencers to market their products, hoping to tap into the influencer's devoted audience. Likewise, influencers create certain content to secure brand deals and attract advertisers. However, this relationship can be fraught with legal issues, including in the arena of copyright law. To prevail on a copyright infringement claim, the plaintiff must prove: 1) the plaintiff owns a valid copyright; and 2) the defendant engaged in unauthorized copying of protected elements of the work.
In this article, we list seven recommendations for both influencers and companies to consider in order to protect themselves against copyright issues.
1. Draft and Enter Into Clear Agreements
All parties' rights and obligations should be outlined in a clearly written contract. Both influencers and companies should be independently represented by qualified counsel to ensure that everyone's expectations are met. The contract should specify who owns the posted content and any approval procedures for such content. The contract should also include whether the company secures a license or assignment of rights to use the influencer's content for marketing purposes. And it should explain the process for obtaining the necessary permissions for any copyrighted content from third parties (for example, music or photos used in the influencer's posts). If a legal dispute occurs later, a court will closely analyze the terms in such contracts. For example, in the Bang Energy drink cases, which involved alleged copyright infringement of famous songs by influencers' sponsored posts, the court analyzed the work for hire agreements that Bang Energy had with social media influencers. See, Sony Music Ent. v. Vital Pharms., Inc., 2022 WL 4771858 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 14, 2022), and UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Vital Pharms., Inc., 2022 WL 2670339 (S.D. Fla. July 11, 2022). In those agreements, Bang Energy agreed to pay a certain percentage of profits for influencers to market their products, and in return the influencers' posts were subject to Bang's supervision, editing, and approval. The terms of these contracts were significant to the court's analysis of whether Bang Energy was liable for contributory and vicarious copyright infringement of the music label's songs.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Role and Responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?