Courts Split Over Requirement for Chapter 15 Jurisdiction In the U.S.

Read These Next

• 

  Appellate Courts Skeptical About Bankruptcy Court Sanctions

  By Michael L. Cook

  Recent appellate decisions reflect a distaste for appeals from bankruptcy court sanction orders. A split Fourth Circuit even refused to hear such an appeal. Other courts tend to limit sanctions or, alternatively, accept a bankruptcy judge’s findings under a stringent “abuse of discretion” standard.

  Read More ›

• 

  Supreme Court’s Rejection of Purdue Pharma Settlement Redefines Releases In Chapter 11

  By Angelo Castaldi

  The U.S. Supreme Court has issued its most anticipated bankruptcy decision in recent memory. In a 5-4 decision entered June 27, the Supreme Court struck down the nonconsensual third-party releases. Writing for the Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch ruled that nothing in the Bankruptcy Code authorized the nonconsensual release or discharge of claims of opioid victims against the Sacklers, who were not debtors themselves.

  Read More ›

• 

  Ninth Circuit: Debt In Asset Case Is Nondischargeable If Debtor Fails to Properly Schedule the Debt

  By Lawrence J. Kotler and Geoffrey A. Heaton

  In a recent published decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressed a previously unresolved question in that circuit: whether a debtor’s failure to properly schedule a debt in an “asset case” renders the debt nondischargeable.

  Read More ›

• 

  Is the Rule Preventing Bankruptcy Judges from Appointing Special Masters Outdated?

  By Mark B. Conlan and Noel L. Hillman

  Rule 9031 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure prevents all bankruptcy judges, and, if broadly interpreted, any federal judge hearing bankruptcy cases and proceedings, from appointing special masters. The rule has not been amended since its adoption in 1983. It is outdated and should be repealed or amended to accord with the reality of today’s complex Chapter 11 cases.

  Read More ›