Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Saadia v. National Society of Hebrew Day Schools, Inc. 2024 WL 1184339 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In purchaser's action for specific performance of a sale contract, purchaser appealed from Supreme Court's grant of seller's motion to dismiss the complaint and cancel the notice of pendency. The appellate Division modified to deny the motion to dismiss and cancel the notice of pendency, while upholding Supreme Court's dismissal of the claims based on unjust enrichment and quantum meruit.
In 2016, purchaser entered into a contract to purchase the subject real property and in 2018 brought an action for specific performance. A stipulation of settlement altered some terms of the contract and set a new closing date of July 23, 2019. When the parties failed to close, purchaser brought a new action for specific performance, damages for breach of contract, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment. The complaint alleged that seller failed to appear at the scheduled closing date, and then, when purchaser sought to close later, seller refused to pay the transfer taxes required by the sale contract, and therefore no closing took place. Supreme Court granted seller's motion to dismiss concluding that a limitation of damages provision in the stipulation precluded purchaser from seeking specific performance or damages for breach of contract. Purchaser appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.