Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Cooper v. Monterey 96 Street LLC 2024 WL 1513931 AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In subtenant's action for wrongful eviction, landlord appealed from Supreme Court's grant of summary judgment to subtenant on the issue of liability. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that landlord was not entitled to lock subtenant out even though landlord had not consented to the sublease.
The primary lease between landlord and tenant required tenant to obtain landlord's consent before entering into a sublease. Despite that provision, and without seeking landlord's consent, tenant sublet the premises to subtenant for a one-month period. Landlord's agent then changed the locks to the apartment and called the police to remove subtenant. Subtenant then brought a wrongful eviction action, and Supreme Court granted summary judgment to subtenant.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?