Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Cap Rate Misery Impacts CRE Investors
Buying property at low cap rates is one of the worst strategies in CRE investment and finance. I have published three books on CRE investment and two of them are titled, "The 50 Commandments of Commercial Real Estate Investment" editions I & II.
The first key detail is that "acquiring commercial real estate at low capitalization rates significantly increases the odds that the equity investors will eventually lose their capital." This is exactly what is occurring today in the 28 month of the Fed's higher interest rate crusade with the federal funds rate at an elevated 5.25% up from 0.0% in March 2022. Property deals in major markets that looked solid back in 2019 and trading at these sub-5% cap rates have now become an albatross and misery for the owners and lenders.
Many investors did not read the 50 Commandments treatise during the last several years and went ahead and bought CRE assets at thin cap rates from 3.25% to 5.0%. These investors were hoping that interest rates would stay low, cap rates would follow, and they would be able to dump, I mean, sell the property to the next chump, I mean, buyer at the same compressed cap rate. The low cap rate regime became a game of musical lifeboats on the Titanic and the big question was, who would get stuck without a lifeboat as the mighty ship sank? As many of us have witnessed over the last few years, many investors from the largest private equity firms to local real estate developers have succumbed to this cap rate misery.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.