Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
O'Malley v. Town of Windsor Planning Board 2024 WL 2035463 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In neighbors' article 78 proceeding challenging a planning board's grant of conditional site plan approval, developers appealed from Supreme Court's grant of the petition. The Appellate Division modified to deny the petition and dismiss the proceeding, holding that the neighbors had failed to exhaust administrative remedies.
In November 2017, developers filed an application for site plan approval for development of an industrial park. In September 2018, the planning board engineer reported to the planning board that the application complied with relevant zoning laws. A year later, in November 2019, the planning board conditionally approved the site plan. Neighbors then brought an article 78 proceeding to annul the approval as arbitrary and capricious, largely because the project allegedly violated local zoning laws. Supreme Court granted the petition and developers appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?