Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Idaho District Court Imposes First-Ever Bond Order Under the State's Bad Faith Assertions of Patent Infringement Act
On May 3, 2023, Judge David C. Nye of the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho issued an order in Katana Silicon Technologies v. Micron Technology, 671 F.Supp.3d 1138 (D. Idaho 2023) and Micron Technology v. Longhorn IP, No. 1:22-cv-00273-DCN (D. Idaho July 5, 2022) (collectively, the litigations), imposing the first-ever bond order under Idaho's Bad Faith Assertions of Patent Infringement Act (the Act).
In that order, the court required patent owner Katana Silicon Technologies (Katana) or its parent company, Longhorn IP LLC (Longhorn), to post an $8 million bond before allowing Katana to proceed with its patent infringement suit against Micron Technology Inc. (Micron), further denying both Katana and Longhorn's motions to dismiss. Katana and Longhorn have since appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, where the appellate panel will consider Katana and Longhorn's preemption challenge to the Act and its bond provision. Oral argument in the appeal has not yet been scheduled.
Currently, more than 30 states have statutes targeting bad faith patent litigation, the constitutionality of which has gone largely unchallenged. Brief of Respondent-Appellee Micron at 1, Micron Technology v. Longhorn IP, No. 23-2007 (Fed. Cir. May 28, 2024), 2024 WL 2859226; Brief of Petitioner-Appellant at 1, Micron Technology v. Longhorn IP, No. 23-2007 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 22, 2024). As a result, the litigations have drawn extensive interest from state attorneys general across the country.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.