Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For those who advise clients on matters relating to cross-border compliance, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§78dd-1, et seq. (FCPA), has been the primary federal anti-bribery law since 1977. That was until Dec. 22, 2023, when President Biden signed into law the Foreign Extortion Prevention Act, 18 U.S.C. §201 (FEPA), as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024. In doing so, the federal government filled a longstanding gap that was unaddressed by FCPA: the "demand side" of foreign bribery and corruption.
FCPA focuses only on the "supply side" of bribery and corruption: it applies to "issuers" (public corporations; 15 U.S.C. §78c(a)(8)) and "domestic concerns" (U.S. citizens, nationals, residents and business entities; 15 U.S.C. §78dd-2(h)(1)) who engage in bribery or corruption of a "foreign official" (15 U.S.C. § 78dd-2(h)(2)).
FEPA, which amends the federal domestic bribery statute, takes aim at the "demand side" of bribery and corruption: foreign officials who demand or receive bribes (18 U.S.C. 201(f)(1)). It is meant to apply extraterritorially to such foreign officials — punishing any acts committed abroad with a U.S. nexus. Together, the FCPA and FEPA are now believed to cover the field for foreign bribery and corruption involving U.S. individuals or entities and foreign officials.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?