Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In April 2024, the Federal Trade Commission voted to adopt a new rule that limits noncompete clauses/agreements (the rule). The rule is slated to go into effect on Sept. 4, 2024. This article summarizes the rule, some pending challenges to the rule, and strategies that businesses should consider implementing today to protect their interests.
|Beginning on Sept. 4, the rule will generally prohibit employers from entering new noncompete clauses with workers. The rule treats existing noncompete agreements differently depending on whether the worker is a "senior executive," which includes workers who: 1) earn more than $151,164 and 2) are in a "policy-making" position. For these, existing noncompete clauses remain valid and enforceable. For all other workers, existing noncompete clauses will no longer be enforceable. Additionally, employers must inform such other workers that any existing noncompete clauses are no longer enforceable.
The rule contains several exceptions. For example, the rule does not apply to noncompete agreements related to a bona fide sale of a business entity. The rule also does not apply where a cause of action related to the noncompete accrued prior to Sept. 4, 2024. It also does not apply to entities outside the FTC's jurisdiction, including certain banks, nonprofits, and state and local government agencies. The rule also provides a "good faith" exception, which provides that it is not unfair competition for a company to enforce or attempt to enforce a noncompete clause if it believes in good faith that the rule is inapplicable. Notably, however, the rule does not contain an exception for workers with access to trade secrets, which has been adopted by some jurisdictions that had previously banned noncompete clauses. The FTC determined that such an exception was unnecessary in view of other less-restrictive alternatives that companies can implement.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.