Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In April 2024, the Federal Trade Commission voted to adopt a new rule that limits noncompete clauses/agreements (the rule). The rule is slated to go into effect on Sept. 4, 2024. This article summarizes the rule, some pending challenges to the rule, and strategies that businesses should consider implementing today to protect their interests.
Beginning on Sept. 4, the rule will generally prohibit employers from entering new noncompete clauses with workers. The rule treats existing noncompete agreements differently depending on whether the worker is a "senior executive," which includes workers who: 1) earn more than $151,164 and 2) are in a "policy-making" position. For these, existing noncompete clauses remain valid and enforceable. For all other workers, existing noncompete clauses will no longer be enforceable. Additionally, employers must inform such other workers that any existing noncompete clauses are no longer enforceable.
The rule contains several exceptions. For example, the rule does not apply to noncompete agreements related to a bona fide sale of a business entity. The rule also does not apply where a cause of action related to the noncompete accrued prior to Sept. 4, 2024. It also does not apply to entities outside the FTC's jurisdiction, including certain banks, nonprofits, and state and local government agencies. The rule also provides a "good faith" exception, which provides that it is not unfair competition for a company to enforce or attempt to enforce a noncompete clause if it believes in good faith that the rule is inapplicable. Notably, however, the rule does not contain an exception for workers with access to trade secrets, which has been adopted by some jurisdictions that had previously banned noncompete clauses. The FTC determined that such an exception was unnecessary in view of other less-restrictive alternatives that companies can implement.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.