Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Strategies and Legal Challenges Following FTC's Noncompete Rule

By Adam Powell and Daniel Hughes
August 01, 2024

In April 2024, the Federal Trade Commission voted to adopt a new rule that limits noncompete clauses/agreements (the rule). The rule is slated to go into effect on Sept. 4, 2024. This article summarizes the rule, some pending challenges to the rule, and strategies that businesses should consider implementing today to protect their interests.

|

What Does the Rule Cover?

Beginning on Sept. 4, the rule will generally prohibit employers from entering new noncompete clauses with workers. The rule treats existing noncompete agreements differently depending on whether the worker is a "senior executive," which includes workers who: 1) earn more than $151,164 and 2) are in a "policy-making" position. For these, existing noncompete clauses remain valid and enforceable. For all other workers, existing noncompete clauses will no longer be enforceable. Additionally, employers must inform such other workers that any existing noncompete clauses are no longer enforceable.

The rule contains several exceptions. For example, the rule does not apply to noncompete agreements related to a bona fide sale of a business entity. The rule also does not apply where a cause of action related to the noncompete accrued prior to Sept. 4, 2024. It also does not apply to entities outside the FTC's jurisdiction, including certain banks, nonprofits, and state and local government agencies. The rule also provides a "good faith" exception, which provides that it is not unfair competition for a company to enforce or attempt to enforce a noncompete clause if it believes in good faith that the rule is inapplicable. Notably, however, the rule does not contain an exception for workers with access to trade secrets, which has been adopted by some jurisdictions that had previously banned noncompete clauses. The FTC determined that such an exception was unnecessary in view of other less-restrictive alternatives that companies can implement.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.