Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On July 12, 2024, a Federal Circuit panel of Chief Judge Moore and Judges Taranto and Chen issued a unanimous opinion, authored by Chief Judge Moore, in Natera, Inc. v. NeoGenomics Labs, Inc., Case Nos. 2024-1324; 2024-1409. The panel affirmed the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina's grant of a preliminary injunction barring NeoGenomics from making, using, selling, advertising or distributing its RaDaR assay. Slip Op. at 2.
Natera, Inc. is a "research-focused healthcare compan[y] operating in the oncology testing industry" that "manufacture[s] products used for early detection of cancer relapse." Id. Natera asserted two patents (U.S. Patent No. 11,519,035 (the '035 Patent) and U.S. Patent No. 11,530,454 (the '454 Patent)) related to methods of amplifying and detecting cell-free DNA and circulating tumor DNA against NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc. (NeoGenomics) Id. at 2-3. While "Natera uses the methods claimed in the '035 and '454 patents in its Signatera product," "NeoGenomics offers a competing product under the brand name RaDaR." Id. at 3. Both Signatera and RaDaR are used to "identify ctDNA within the bloodstream to assess the efficacy of cancer treatment and the risk of cancer recurrence." Id.
"Natera sued NeoGenomics alleging RaDaR infringed the '035 and '454 patents and moved for a preliminary injunction." Id. at 4. The district court "granted the preliminary injunction because it determined Natera satisfied the requirements for injunctive relief, including likelihood of success on the merits of its '035 patent infringement claim." Id. The panel reviewed the district court's grant of a preliminary injunction for abuse of discretion and explained that to "obtain a preliminary injunction, a party must establish likelihood of success on the merits, likelihood it will suffer irreparable harm absent preliminary relief, the balance of equities tips in its favor, and an injunction is in the public interest." Id. at 5-6.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.