Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Elk 33 East 33rd LLC v. Sticky's Corporate LLC 2024 WL 2925641 AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In landlord's action to collect on the lease, the corporate guaranty, and the good guy guaranty, tenant appealed from Supreme Court's grant of summary judgment to landlord. The Appellate Division remanded for a determination whether the lease's liquidated damages provision constituted an unenforceable penalty, but otherwise affirmed.
The lease required landlord's written acceptance of tenant's surrender, and tenant never obtained that written acceptance. As a result, the guarantors remained liable for tenant's breach. The lease provided that upon breach by tenant, landlord could accelerate the rent through the expiration of the lease, discounted to present value, or landlord could collect rent when due through the end of the lease, provided that it gave tenant a credit if the premises were relet. Landlord elected to accelerate the rent, and Supreme Court awarded landlord $576,000, which included an award of attorneys fees. Tenant appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?