Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Instant access to the internet has made sharing photographs online easy. Unfortunately, this has opened the door to revenge porn. Also known as nonconsensual pornography, revenge porn is a serious violation of privacy that can have devastating consequences for victims. How might a victim of revenge porn counteract posts of compromising photographs to social media?
|The Stopping Harmful Image Exploitation and Limiting Distribution (S.H.I.E.L.D.) Act, codified at 15 U.S. Code Section 6851, provides protection against nonconsensual pornography. This federal law makes it illegal to knowingly distribute intimate visual depictions of an individual without that person's consent that depicts:
"(i) the uncovered genitals, pubic area, anus, or post-pubescent female nipple of an identifiable individual; or
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.