Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For good reason, ordinarily courts are reluctant to admit statements of counsel as evidence in a criminal trial. Rulings in two recent high-profile local cases defy the common wisdom. In U.S. v. Menendez, No. 23-cr-490 (S.D.N.Y.), the prosecution of New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez and others on bribery and related charges, the court admitted a PowerPoint presentation Menendez's counsel made to prosecutors prior to indictment as part of an attorney proffer. The government offered the presentation in support of obstruction charges included in a subsequent indictment against the senator. Not surprisingly, the government's aggressive step has gotten the attention of the defense bar. Although the government has indicated that it expects such uses of attorney proffers to be rare, as discussed below, its action is troubling and not unique. The government's step suggests precautions that defense counsel should consider in making attorney proffers.
In U.S. v. Coburn & Schwartz, No. 19-cr-120 (D.N.J.), a District of New Jersey prosecution of former senior executives of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (Cognizant) on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) charges based on the alleged bribery of Indian government officials, the court upheld a defense subpoena seeking trial testimony from the prominent law firm that conducted an internal investigation in the matter. The ruling confirms the well-recognized risk that presenting information regarding an internal investigation to prosecutors waives any privilege regarding what was presented. The ruling also illustrates how a narrowly tailored demand for testimony about what an internal investigation failed to find can be a potentially valuable tool for defense counsel.
|On Sept. 11, 2023, in the late stages of an investigation conducted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), Menendez's then-attorney, Abbe Lowell, met with senior SDNY prosecutors and made a PowerPoint presentation outlining his client's theory of the facts. The presentation included the express statement that two categories of payments, a payoff of Menendez's then-girlfriend Nadine's mortgage, and payments on her behalf for a Mercedes, were "unknown to [the] Senator" until after the government's investigation began. The presentation also included statements characterizing the payments as loans, which Menendez repaid after learning about them, again, after the investigation began.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.