Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The DOJ's Whistleblower Pilot Program Adds Incentives for Robust Corporate Compliance Programs

By Jonathan New, Patrick Campbell and Sydney Park
September 01, 2024

As Deputy Attorney General (DAG) Lisa Monaco recently observed, "[g]oing back to the days of 'Wanted' posters across the Old West, law enforcement has long offered rewards to coax tipsters out of the woodwork." On Aug. 1, 2024, the Department of Justice (DOJ or Department) joined the club of federal law enforcement agencies that have adapted this approach to white-collar crime by launching its own three-year Whistleblower Pilot Program. The Whistleblower Pilot Program will provide monetary awards to whistleblowers who provide the Department with original and truthful information about certain types of corporate misconduct that leads to a successful asset forfeiture. If the success of other government whistleblower programs, such as the one administered by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), is any measure, the DOJ can be expected to see a surge of reports alleging corruption, money laundering and other corporate fraud. If this is not enough reason for companies to take a fresh look at their compliance programs to ensure they are effective at quickly detecting and remediating misconduct, the DOJ simultaneously amended the Criminal Division's Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (Corporate Enforcement Policy) to allow companies the opportunity for full voluntary self-disclosure benefits even after the DOJ receives a whistleblower tip — so long as the company self-reports that conduct to the DOJ within 120 days of receiving an internal report and before the DOJ contacts the company. While on the one hand, the DOJ is clearly sending a message to employees that if they see something, say something, as DAG Monaco stated to companies in no uncertain terms, "[o]ur message is equally clear: knock on our door before we knock on yours."

As stated in the program guidance, the Whistleblower Pilot Program's purpose is to fill gaps in the coverage of information that the DOJ has obtained and used for its investigations and prosecutions from already-existing whistleblower programs run by agencies like the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and from individuals who bring qui tam actions under the False Claims Act (FCA). However, DAG Monaco noted that the legislative jurisdiction of these preexisting whistleblower programs is like a "patchwork quilt that doesn't cover the whole bed. They simple don't address the full range of corporate and financial misconduct that the [DOJ] prosecutes." In order to do so, the DOJ designed the Whistleblower Pilot Program to encourage tips in four areas not covered by other whistleblower programs:

  1. Certain crimes involving nonregulated financial institutions or their insiders or agents, including schemes involving money laundering, anti-money laundering compliance violations, the registration of money-transmitting businesses and fraud violations;
  2. Foreign corruption by, through or related to privately held companies, including violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Foreign Extortion Prevention Act (FEPA) and money-laundering statutes;
  3. Domestic corruption violations involving companies; and
  4. Healthcare fraud schemes that target private insurers or nonpublic healthcare benefit programs or that defraud patients, investors or nongovernmental entities in the healthcare industry and that are not subject to qui tam recovery under the FCA. Under the program, the DOJ will use the Attorney General's discretionary authority under 28 U.S.C. §524(c) to pay "awards for information or assistance leading to a civil or criminal forfeiture" in these areas of focus.

In order for an individual who reports misconduct in one of these four areas to qualify for an award under the Whistleblower Pilot Program, the individual must meet a number of criteria:

  • The information must be truthful, original and complete. A whistleblower's information must be something that the DOJ does not already know. The DOJ defines "original" information as information that is derived from the individual's independent knowledge or independent analysis of information in the individual's possession that is not derived from public sources. The DOJ also considers information original if it materially adds to information that the Department already has in its possession. Notably, while employees are not required to report internally through a company's internal compliance procedures first, those who choose to do so remain eligible to receive an award as long as they also report their information to the Department with 120 days of reporting it internally.
  • The information must be given voluntarily. Whistleblowers must offer the information voluntarily. An individual's submission of information will be considered voluntary: i) if it occurs before any formal request, inquiry or demand is directed to the individual; ii) where the individual has no preexisting obligation to the disclose the information; and iii) in the absence of any government investigation or imminent disclosure to the government or the public.
  • The individual must not be eligible for an award under another whistleblower program. Individuals can be ineligible for awards under the Whistleblower Pilot Program if they are eligible for an award under another U.S. government whistleblower, qui tam or similar program had they reported the same information.
  • The individual must fully cooperate, and the tip must lead to a successful forfeiture. To be eligible for an award, the whistleblower must fully cooperate with the DOJ and the tip must lead to a successful civil or criminal forfeiture exceeding $1 million in net proceeds forfeited to the Department.
  • The individual must have clean hands. A whistleblower is ineligible for an award under the Whistleblower Pilot Program if the individual had any meaningful culpability in the criminal activity or had a management role in overseeing the offices or personnel involved in the misconduct.

Regarding compensation, awards can be up to 30% of the first $100 million of a successful forfeiture and 5% of proceeds between $100 million and $500 million. A "successful forfeiture" is when the Department obtains a final order of forfeiture, a civil judgment of forfeiture or an administrative declaration related to assets obtained and those assets are deposited in the Assets Forfeiture Fund. All awards are issued at the sole discretion of the Department. In deciding the amount of the award, the Department considers various factors, including the significance of the information reported, the whistleblower's participation in internal compliance systems by reporting internally first and the whistleblower's cooperation with law enforcement. In the fact sheet published with the announcement of the Whistleblower Pilot Program, the DOJ also noted that if it learns that any person or entity takes any action to prevent a whistleblower from making a report, the DOJ could open a criminal investigation into obstruction of justice.

The Whistleblower Pilot Program is the latest of a series of new or updated policies announced by the DOJ within the past two years designed to encourage self-disclosure by both individuals and companies. In January 2023, the DOJ announced significant amendments to the Corporate Enforcement Policy, which increased incentives for companies to voluntarily self-disclose misconduct, fully cooperate, and timely and appropriately remediate by broadening the availability of a presumption of declination and reduction of financial penalties. In October 2023, the DOJ announced a Department-wide Mergers and Acquisitions Safe Harbor Policy, which provides a presumption of declination to acquiring companies that voluntarily disclose criminal misconduct discovered at the acquired entity within a safe harbor period, cooperate with an ensuing investigation, and engage in requisite, timely and appropriate remediation. Finally, earlier this year, the DOJ announced a pilot program on voluntary self-disclosure for individuals, under which culpable individuals who fully cooperate and voluntarily provide the Criminal Division with information on certain types of corporate and white-collar offenses may receive a non-prosecution agreement in exchange for their cooperation. Now non-culpable individuals who provide reports of certain corporate misconduct to the DOJ can qualify for substantial financial benefits. The corresponding amendment to the Corporate Enforcement Policy, which gives companies the opportunity to qualify for a presumption of declination so long as they report to the DOJ within 120 days after receiving an internal report and before the DOJ reaches out to them, provides another strong incentive for corporate self-disclosure.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.