Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Can a Licensor Receive Royalty Payments Beyond the Life of Patent Protection?

By Matthew Golden
October 01, 2024

An axiom of patent licensing is that a patent owner cannot receive royalty payments for post-expiration use of its patented technology. However, in exercising their rights to freedom of contract, parties to an IP license may desire flexibility in how they structure payments for the underlying licensed IP. For example, the parties may be willing to trade upfront payments and higher royalty rates for an extended life of royalty payments at a lower royalty rate. How do you determine if the ongoing royalty obligations that extend beyond the life of underlying patent protection, even if agreed to by the contracting parties, are enforceable? A recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit shows what types of license arrangements pass the test.

The Ares Case

The dispute in Ares Trading SA v. Dyax Corp., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40484, revolves around multiple players involved in a process of drug development, each of whom is trying to get a piece of the ultimate pie:  revenue based on sales of the resulting drug product. In this case, the drug product was an antibody-based cancer therapeutic that was discovered using patented antibody-screening technology owned by Cambridge Antibody Technology (CAT). CAT licensed its patents to companies including Dyax to perform antibody screening in exchange for royalty payments based on the subsequent sale of the developed drug product.

In the transaction at the center of the Ares dispute, Ares had hired Dyax to perform antibody screening for a particular biological target identified by Ares. Ares then developed one of the antibodies Dyax uncovered into the commercial cancer therapeutic. Under its license with CAT, Dyax was required to pay a royalty on any drug product discovered using the CAT-patented technology. Dyax sublicensed its rights under the CAT license to Ares along with its royalty obligation, which required Ares to pay Dyax a royalty for the longer of the life of the CAT patents or 10 years from the first sale of the drug. In this case, Ares did not begin sales of its drug product until 2017, and the CAT patents expired in 2018. Thus, Ares had agreed to pay royalties well beyond the life of the underlying CAT patents.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bonus Content: How Emerging Technologies Are Impacting IP: A Chat With Legalweek Speaker Ryan Phelan Image

A Q&A with conference speaker Ryan Phelan, a partner at Marshall, Gerstein & Borun and founder and moderator of legal blog PatentNext, to discuss how courts and jurisdictions are handling novel technologies, the copyrightability of AI-assisted art, and more.

Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.