Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Introduced in 2019, Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. Section 1181 et seq.) has been an invaluable tool for lawyers advising financially troubled small businesses. It provides a streamlined, cost-effective process for reorganization. Where it applies, Subchapter V has been a great success. But, much of that success was due to a temporary change to the law that allowed more companies to qualify for Subchapter V treatment. That change has now expired, taking with it the only viable avenue for many businesses to reorganize.
Bankruptcy practitioners have long recognized that traditional Chapter 11 reorganizations are too complicated, too lengthy and too expensive for any but the largest businesses. Small, generally family-owned, businesses were simply priced out of the process. To remedy this, Subchapter V made some key changes to the Bankruptcy Code to make the process more efficient in smaller cases.
Eligibility for Subchapter V is limited. The debtor, which can be an individual or an entity, must be engaged in business or commercial activity and at least half of its debts must be from that activity. Public companies and their affiliates are ineligible as are entities that primarily hold a single real estate asset. The biggest limitation, however, is the amount of debt owed.
As originally passed, Subchapter V was limited to debtors who owed less than $2.7 million in total liquidated, non-contingent debt. While the debt limit is indexed to inflation, it is relatively low. Shortly after Subchapter V became effective, the COVID pandemic began. Due to the pandemic, Congress temporarily increased the debt limit to $7.5 million.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?