Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Introduced in 2019, Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. Section 1181 et seq.) has been an invaluable tool for lawyers advising financially troubled small businesses. It provides a streamlined, cost-effective process for reorganization. Where it applies, Subchapter V has been a great success. But, much of that success was due to a temporary change to the law that allowed more companies to qualify for Subchapter V treatment. That change has now expired, taking with it the only viable avenue for many businesses to reorganize.
Bankruptcy practitioners have long recognized that traditional Chapter 11 reorganizations are too complicated, too lengthy and too expensive for any but the largest businesses. Small, generally family-owned, businesses were simply priced out of the process. To remedy this, Subchapter V made some key changes to the Bankruptcy Code to make the process more efficient in smaller cases.
Eligibility for Subchapter V is limited. The debtor, which can be an individual or an entity, must be engaged in business or commercial activity and at least half of its debts must be from that activity. Public companies and their affiliates are ineligible as are entities that primarily hold a single real estate asset. The biggest limitation, however, is the amount of debt owed.
As originally passed, Subchapter V was limited to debtors who owed less than $2.7 million in total liquidated, non-contingent debt. While the debt limit is indexed to inflation, it is relatively low. Shortly after Subchapter V became effective, the COVID pandemic began. Due to the pandemic, Congress temporarily increased the debt limit to $7.5 million.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.