Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Congress' Failure to Extend Subchapter V Debt Limit Hurts Small Businesses

By Michael Napoli
October 01, 2024

Introduced in 2019, Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. Section 1181 et seq.) has been an invaluable tool for lawyers advising financially troubled small businesses. It provides a streamlined, cost-effective process for reorganization. Where it applies, Subchapter V has been a great success. But, much of that success was due to a temporary change to the law that allowed more companies to qualify for Subchapter V treatment. That change has now expired, taking with it the only viable avenue for many businesses to reorganize.

Bankruptcy practitioners have long recognized that traditional Chapter 11 reorganizations are too complicated, too lengthy and too expensive for any but the largest businesses. Small, generally family-owned, businesses were simply priced out of the process. To remedy this, Subchapter V made some key changes to the Bankruptcy Code to make the process more efficient in smaller cases.

|
  • Created the Subchapter V trustee: Unlike a normal bankruptcy trustee who takes over the assets or operates the debtor's business, a Subchapter V trustee assists the debtor in navigating the bankruptcy process. A Subchapter V trustee advises the debtor and helps to negotiate the plan of reorganization. He or she often acts as an informal mediator between the debtor and its creditors.
  • No "absolute priority" rule: Typically in bankruptcy, assets are distributed in a strict hierarchy—secured claims, administrative claims, unsecured claims, and then equity. As a result, the owner may be more likely to lose the business. In Subchapter V, the owner generally retains ownership of the business.
  • Streamlined the plan of reorganization process: |
    • The debtor must file a plan of reorganization within 90 days.
    • While it must disclose its financial condition, the debtor is not required to file a formal disclosure statement. A disclosure statement is a complicated document (similar to a securities offering) that is distributed to the creditors before they vote on a plan of reorganization. The statement must be approved by the court in advance and is often the subject of extensive negotiation and litigation. By eliminating the disclosure statement, Subchapter V not only gets rid of an expensive document but also some collateral litigation.
  • Allows non-consensual plans: Typically in bankruptcy at least one "impaired" class must vote in favor of the plan. An impaired class is one whose rights are modified by the plan—typically, by receiving less than the full amount of their claims. In contrast, Subchapter V allows a plan to be confirmed over the creditors' objections so long as the plan provides that the debtor will use all of its disposable income for a period of at least three years to make payments under the plan and provides some means of enforcement. |
    • If the plan is consensual (all impaired classes vote in favor), then the debtor receives an immediate discharge. If not, the debtor's discharge is delayed until the debtor makes all payments required by the plan for a period of at least three years.

Eligibility for Subchapter V is limited. The debtor, which can be an individual or an entity, must be engaged in business or commercial activity and at least half of its debts must be from that activity. Public companies and their affiliates are ineligible as are entities that primarily hold a single real estate asset. The biggest limitation, however, is the amount of debt owed.

As originally passed, Subchapter V was limited to debtors who owed less than $2.7 million in total liquidated, non-contingent debt. While the debt limit is indexed to inflation, it is relatively low. Shortly after Subchapter V became effective, the COVID pandemic began. Due to the pandemic, Congress temporarily increased the debt limit to $7.5 million.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Top 5 Strategies for Managing the End-of-Year Collections Frenzy Image

End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.

The Self-Service Buyer Is On the Rise Image

Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.

Should Large Law Firms Penalize RTO Rebels or Explore Alternatives? Image

Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.

Sink or Swim: The Evolving State of Law Firm Administrative Support Image

The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?

Tax Treatment of Judgments and Settlements Image

Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.