Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Gugino v. Scripa, 2024 WL 2964516, AppDiv, Third Dept. (Opinion by Reynolds Fitzgerald, J)
In an action by easement holder for a judgment declaring his easement rights and for an injunction requiring servient owner to remove a permanent dock, servient owner appealed from Supreme Court's grant of partial summary judgment to easement holder. The Appellate Division modified to reverse Supreme Court's determination that easement holder had acquired a prescriptive easement, but otherwise affirmed, holding that the scope of the easement by grant included dominant owner's right to maintain a seasonal dock.
In 1958, the predecessors in interest of the parties entered into an easement agreeing giving each of them and their successors a perpetual easement over a 44 x 38 foot parcel of land on the lakeshore for the purpose of boating, bathing and docking. Since then the easement holder had maintained a seasonal dock in the center of the lake frontage. In 2021, servient owner purchased the lakeshore frontage and installed a permanent dock where the seasonal dock had always been. Easement holder then brought this action seeking removal of the permanent dock and a declaration of his rights to the easement. Supreme Court granted partial summary judgment to easement holder.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.