Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Commercial property insurance is an essential form of protection for any business that owns or leases property. Like most insurance policies, commercial property policies are subject to coverage limits setting forth the maximum amount the insurer(s) are contractually obligated to pay. While in many cases involving a substantial property loss the applicable policy limit is clear, in some cases it is not, and the amount to which the policyholder is entitled is governed by a confluence of policy provisions informed by applicable state law.
For purposes of our discussion, assume a policyholder owns a building that suffered a near-total covered loss. Assume the policyholder holds a commercial property policy insuring multiple separate properties with an aggregate policy limit of $100 million. Finally, assume the damaged building has a "scheduled" value of $10 million based on a schedule of values on file with the insurer, a market value of $15 million, and that repairs necessary to return the building to its pre-loss condition will cost $20 million. Whether the policyholder is entitled to recover $20 million, $15 million, $10 million (or some number in between) depends on the type of policy at issue and the interaction of loss payment (or loss-settlement), valuation and like provisions governing the extent of the insurer's liability. Examples of those policies and provisions are discussed below
|Commercial property policies covering multiple properties usually contain either "blanket" or "scheduled" limits of liability. A blanket limit policy is one with a stated limit that applies on an aggregate basis to any or all locations covered by the policy. These limits are typically much larger than the value of any single property and are reduced by payment of loss to one or more properties, with the balance of the applicable blanket limit available to cover damage to the other properties. Where a property policy provides a blanket limit, absent express language to the contrary, coverage for damage to a particular building is not limited to the amount stated as the building's value even where the policy has or references a schedule of values for each location. In contrast, a policy with true "scheduled" limits is one that contains or references a schedule of insured values for each property and makes expressly clear that the insurer's liability for each scheduled location is limited to the scheduled value for that location.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.