Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Town of Riverhead v. Kar-McVeigh, LLC, 2024 WL 3514370, AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In the town's action for declaratory and injunctive relief precluding landlord from hosting catered events in tents, landowner appealed from Supreme Court's grant of a preliminary injunction and denial of landowner's motion to dismiss the complaint. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that landowner had not established an entitlement to hold those events as a pre-existing nonconforming use.
Landowner operates a restaurant as a preexisting nonconforming use in an agricultural district. The town brought an action contending that hosting catered events in tents constituted a public nuisance and an expansion of a legal nonconforming use, which would require a special permit. Landowner sought dismissal of the complaint, relying on a 2004 determination by the town's zoning board of appeals that catering is a type of restaurant use. Supreme Court nevertheless denied landowner's motion to dismiss and granted the town's motion for a preliminary injunction.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.