Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Section 504(c)(1) of the U.S. Copyright Act states that a "copyright owner may elect … to recover, instead of actual damages and profits, an award of statutory damages for all infringements involved in the action, with respect to any one work …." In determining the amount of a statutory award — which is based on the number of works infringed, rather than the number of times those works were infringed — "all parts of a compilation or derivative work constitute one work," the statute adds.
Most of the federal circuit courts [i.e., the D.C., First, Seventh, Ninth and Eleventh Circuits] that have addressed what qualifies either as a "compilation" or as a single creative work apply an "independent economic value" analysis that looks at the market worth of the single creation as of the time when an infringement occurs.
But in a recent ruling of first impression for it, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected the "independent economic value" test in determining which individual sound recordings are §504(c)(1) "works" eligible for their own statutory awards and which are part of compilation. UMG Recordings Inc. v. Grande Communications Networks L.L.C., 23-50162 (5th Cir. 2024).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.