Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Given the downward pressure on commercial real estate valuations in many areas, and the increasing likelihood that owners of real property will cease paying real property taxes when there is no longer any equity, we decided to report on a recent decision issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that reversed a decision of the bankruptcy court, affirmed by the district court, allocating the distribution of the proceeds of a sale of real property pro rata between the Internal Revenue Service, on account of its tax lien, and the bankruptcy estate. In this era of textual jurisprudence, it comes as no surprise that the Ninth Circuit scrutinized the lower courts' reliance on the general powers of the court under Section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code to apply a "pro-rata method" in order to effect a distribution to the bankruptcy estate.
In In re Leite, Case No. 23-15825, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the decision of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for District of Arizona, and in a case of first impression, held where the trustee avoids the portion of a tax lien attributable to penalties, the sale proceeds must be used first to pay in full the unavoided tax lien liability amount rather than allocating the proceeds pro rata.
|According to the opinion, the IRS recorded a tax lien in 2013 against real property located in Connecticut for unpaid taxes. The owners filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case in 2019 in the Arizona Bankruptcy Court. The IRS held a claim in the case consisting of $45,938.99 in taxes (and related interest) and $24,991.14 in penalties. The Chapter 7 trustee sold the property in 2020. The net sales proceeds were $38,640.80.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.