Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Do Pharmaceutical Patents Do More Harm Than Good?

By Ikenna C. Ejimonyeugwo
December 01, 2024


By Ikenna C. Ejimonyeugwo

Pharmaceutical patents are the backbone of the modern pharmaceutical industry. They allow drug developers to possess exclusive rights in their inventions for a limited period of time. That exclusivity drives innovation and is critically important to a pharmaceutical company’s return on investment.
Developing a new drug is risky and costly, with recent estimates ranging from $314 million to $2.8 billion. With so much at stake, it is imperative for pharmaceutical companies to secure patents on their drug products to prevent competitors from copying or selling them without permission. A patent safeguards a company’s goal of recouping substantial costs associated with the research, development, and clinical trials of new drugs.
Despite the obvious benefits of pharmaceutical patents, they are also a source of contentious debate concerning issues of unaffordable drug pricing, accessibility to medication, and unfair competition. Many argue that pharmaceutical patents cause more harm than good. For example, given that a patent effectively grants a monopoly over a drug for the life of the patent, patent owners may charge higher prices to secure higher profit, knowing a competing drug or generic version is unable to enter the market during that time. This can be problematic if it causes life-saving medications to become unaffordable.
This article discusses how a pharmaceutical patent works, its role in drug development, and the polarizing impact it has on global health care.

What Is a Pharmaceutical Patent?

A U.S. patent is a legal right granted by the government to an inventor “to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the invention throughout the United States” for a limited time — usually 20 years from the patent’s filing date — in exchange for public disclosure of the invention. See, 35 USCS Section 154.
Pharmaceutical patents are granted for newly invented drugs that are: directed to patentable subject matter; novel or new; useful; nonobvious; and clearly described to enable a person of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention.
The process of obtaining a pharmaceutical patent is complex, rigorous and time-consuming. Pharmaceutical companies begin by performing research and development to discover new compounds and therapeutic agents in potential drug formulations. The R&D process generally involves years of laboratory work, animal testing and clinical studies.
Once a new drug or pharmaceutical agent is identified, the inventor can file a patent application with a patent office. The application must include specific details about the invention, such as its chemical structure, the method of production, and the intended therapeutic use. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) offers guidance and tools to assist with filing patent applications.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

"Holy Fair Use, Batman": Copyright, Fair Use and the Dark Knight Image

The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.