Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
By Craig R. Heeren, Mollie D. Sitkowski and Angela Lam
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has proposed a rule that would regulate certain transactions involving bulk sensitive personal data. Public comments are due in 30 days from the notice date.
The rule would implement a complex regulatory framework, with civil and criminal enforcement, that is similar to sanctions and export licensing regimes. It also implicates federal cybersecurity requirements, government contracting and CFIUS actions.
Businesses that handle significant amounts of sensitive personal data, as well as those that handle any amount of certain U.S. government data, should ensure they are prepared for these significant new potential regulations.
On Oct. 21, 2024, the National Security Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ NSD) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that would establish a comprehensive regulatory framework to prevent and restrict the transfer of “bulk sensitive personal data” to countries and entities that are deemed a risk to U.S. national security. As explained in a prior insight regarding an advance notice of proposed rulemaking on this issue, the DOJ is issuing this rule after the Biden administration directed federal agencies to issue regulations to respond to the concern of misuse of sensitive data that could impact national security. The NPRM addresses comments provided through the advance notice process, details the proposed rule, and provides for an additional 30-day comment period. As discussed below, the proposed rule is a significant effort to regulate data through civil and criminal enforcement mechanisms akin to sanctions and export control regulations. Businesses potentially subject to its reach should carefully consider how to handle the rule’s implementation.
The DOJ NSD rule would prohibit or restrict the transfer of “bulk sensitive personal data” or “government-related data” to certain “countries of concern” and “covered persons,” unless the transaction meets certain cybersecurity requirements or a license permitting the transaction is provided by the Department of Justice. Certain transactions are exempt from this rule. Some of the key provisions include the following:
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.