Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In landlord’s action for breach of a commercial lease, landlord appealed from Supreme Court’s grant of tenant’s motion to dismiss. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that tenant was not in default under the lease.
The parties entered into a 10-year lease in January 2017. In September 2019, tenant notified landlord that it was electing to terminate the lease in accordance with its provisions, and that it would vacate the premises on or before March 27, 2020. Tenant surrendered the premises on or about that date and made rent payments until April 1, 2020. In September 2020, landlord brought an action to recover damages for breach. Landlord contended that tenant was a holdover because tenant breached the lease by leaving garbage and equipment behind after it vacated, and contended that landlord was entitled to 2½ times the monthly rent pursuant to a holdover provision in the lease. Supreme Court granted tenant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, emphasizing landlord’s failure to serve tenant with a notice of default or notice of termination for failure to cure a default.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?