Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Fifth Circuit Weighs In On Constitutionality of the Corporate Transparency Act

By John C. Coffee, Jr.
February 01, 2025

Events have moved swiftly and symptomatically lately in the Fifth Circuit. Long known as the circuit with the greatest skepticism of federal regulation of the economy, it turned its attention to the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), 31 U.S.C. §5336, which requires non-exempt companies to report the identity of their beneficial owners. While many companies saw the CTA as burdensome and ill-advised, the statute had seemed constitutionally safe because it only regulated commercial activity and only required information. Yet, on Dec. 3, 2024, a district court in the Eastern District of Texas held that the CTA was unconstitutional and issued a nationwide injunction against the enforcement of the CTA and its implementing rule. See, Tex. Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218294 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2024).

This result may have seemed par for the course in terms of recent decisions in the Fifth Circuit, which decisions have also struck down the SEC’s Climate Change Disclosure Rules and the Federal Trade Commission’s attempts to prohibit covenants not to compete and, more ominously, resurrected the long dormant anti-delegation doctrine in a way that questions the constitutionality of many administrative agencies. See, Consumers’ Rsch. Cause Based Commerce, Inc. v. FCC, 109 F.4th 743 (5th Cir. 2024) (finding the combination of broad delegation and possible future delegation to a private entity to violate the separation of powers).

Still, there were additional factors that made this case seem a particularly unusual example of judicial overreaching. First, the injunction was issued on the eve of the initial reporting deadline under the CTA, and it thus spared all companies from an obligation to file, even though three decisions in other circuits had either upheld the CTA as constitutional or granted only a stay covering the parties (and thus kept the deadline in force with respect to others). Even more surprising, no party in the Tex. Top Cop Shop case had requested any such nationwide injunction. That was an invention of the district judge. Thinking that the decision was an outlier, the government filed an emergency motion with the Fifth Circuit seeking to stay the injunction.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?