Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Corporate deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) have become a key part of white-collar criminal enforcement. With a DPA, a company can resolve a criminal investigation without a guilty plea, while the government gets remediation of misconduct and a corporate admission of wrongdoing. These benefits have encouraged other countries to adopt, or consider adopting, similar arrangements, even where DPAs do not fit neatly in existing criminal procedures, such as France, England and Switzerland.
Corporate DPAs have also generated criticism. The critics say that: i) DPAs have been overly lenient to companies, and have contributed to prosecutors’ willingness to settle with companies rather than aggressively pursue individual wrongdoers; ii) DPAs have been negotiated in secrecy and have failed to protect the rights of victims of corporate misconduct; or iii) DPAs have led not to promised corporate reform but, too often, to cosmetic changes and corporate recidivism due to inadequate sanctions and oversight. Companies still regularly enter into DPAs with the Department of Justice (DOJ), but their benefits may have become less clear and certain over time.
The January 2021 DPA between the Boeing Co. (Boeing) and DOJ illustrates the many complications that may flow from a corporate DPA. The Boeing DPA came after two plane crashes that were attributed to a software design flaw and a resulting criminal investigation. Pursuant to the DPA, the company admitted to making false and misleading statements to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A Q&A with conference speaker Ryan Phelan, a partner at Marshall, Gerstein & Borun and founder and moderator of legal blog PatentNext, to discuss how courts and jurisdictions are handling novel technologies, the copyrightability of AI-assisted art, and more.
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.