Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Driven by promises of increased efficiency and innovation, companies spanning a wide variety of industries are rapidly adopting and investing in artificial intelligence (AI). Public companies have now started to include AI-specific risk disclosures in their routine Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) filings, and many have issued other public statements about how they utilize AI. The explosion of interest in AI has also spurred the attention of the SEC and private shareholder plaintiffs. In the past year alone, the SEC brought several enforcement actions and shareholder plaintiffs filed numerous securities class actions focusing on AI-related statements and disclosures.
Companies should continue to closely consider their public statements related to AI and implement appropriate precautions when discussing their AI initiatives.
In the last year, the SEC filed eight enforcement actions focused on combating “AI washing” — the practice of making false or aggrandized representations about a company’s use of AI or what specific AI technologies can do. Each action targeted a company that claimed to incorporate AI technologies into its business and made optimistic, sometimes sweeping, public statements about its use of AI, but in reality failed to utilize the technology as described. (Four of these actions were resolved through consent orders, with penalties ranging from $50,000 to $310,000. Three actions remain in active litigation and one action has concluded with a judgment against the defendants. Two individual defendants also face associated criminal charges.) While the SEC’s priorities may shift under the incoming administration, if the SEC remains focused on new and emerging technologies as it has to date, these cases may be only the tip of the iceberg for the SEC actions concerning AI.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A Q&A with conference speaker Ryan Phelan, a partner at Marshall, Gerstein & Borun and founder and moderator of legal blog PatentNext, to discuss how courts and jurisdictions are handling novel technologies, the copyrightability of AI-assisted art, and more.
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.