Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that a lawsuit, in which the plaintiff alleged that Alex Mashinsky, the founder and ex-CEO of Celsius Network, caused the insolvent crypto lender to incur billions of dollars in damages, can move forward because the terms of the agreement to stay stated that it would be lifted when the litigant’s criminal trial ended.
Alan Rosenberg, a partner at Markowitz Ringel Trusty & Hartog, said that while it is understandable that a criminal defendant such as Mashinsky would not want to litigate simultaneously on multiple fronts, bankruptcy courts are “not receptive to stall tactics.” Rosenberg also suggested that potential Fifth Amendment issues do not necessarily mandate the stay of a civil action during a pending, related criminal proceeding.
“Delays in insolvency proceedings not only frustrate the bankruptcy process, but also increase administrative expenses, which ultimately deplete the recovery for creditors,” said Rosenberg, who is not involved in the matter. “Given Mashinsky’s guilty plea — and thus, the cancellation of the January 28 trial — coupled with the litigation administrators’ agreement to structure the trial schedule to accommodate the TL customers’ concerns, Judge Glenn’s ruling was correct.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?