Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sports leagues and competitions' market clout and the increasing consolidation of sports content-streaming companies have recently spawned several civil antitrust actions aimed at reigning in these market powers.
In 2311 Racing LLC v. National Association of Stock Car Racing LLC (NASCAR), 3:24-CV-00886 (W.D.N.C.), racing teams 2311 and Front Row Motorsports Inc. have sued NASCAR over the latter’s inclusion of a waiver clause in agreements that permit teams to compete in NASCAR’s 2025 pinnacle Cup Series. The disputed clause states in part: “Team Owner … hereby releases and forever discharges [NASCAR Event Management] ... from all [claims] ... arising out of or relating to the criteria used by [NASCAR Event Management] to determine whether or not to enter into, or to offer to enter into, a Charter Member Agreement with the Team Owner or any other Person ....”
Thirteen of NASCAR’s 15 teams signed the 2025 Charter Agreement in September 2024 allegedly based on NASCAR’s ending contract negotiations and requiring the teams to sign the charter agreements within a few hours. The other two teams 2311 and Front Row instead filed an antitrust complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina accusing NASCAR of antitrust activity in violation of the federal Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§1 and 2.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.