Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A flurry of developments in late January 2025 has caused quite a buzz in the AI world. On January 20, DeepSeek released a new open-source AI model called R1 and an accompanying research paper. R1 was touted as performing comparably to proprietary frontier models at a fraction of the cost, with drastically reduced computational resources needed both to train and run the model. DeepSeek explained that it used new techniques in reinforcement learning, but others suspect that it might also have benefitted from unauthorized model distillation. Within a week, there was a strong market reaction, with AI-related semiconductor stocks dropping more than 10% on January 27.
Just a few days later, on January 29, the U.S. Copyright Office published the second installment of its three-part Report on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence — this part focusing on the copyrightability of AI-generated outputs. In that report, the Copyright Office analyzed the amount and nature of human contribution needed to bring AI outputs within the scope of U.S. copyright protection. It concluded that existing law remains appropriate for the new AI technologies and that mere prompts generally do not meet the standard of human contribution needed for copyright protection. It gathered and considered public comments for its analysis but rejected arguments that legal change is necessary to counter international competition, such as foreign entities distilling U.S. frontier models.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property (IP). Existing countermeasures have primarily focused on technical solutions, such as restricting access through application programming interface (API) rate limiting or embedding traceable watermarks in AI outputs. This article will examine the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.