Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the United States, a debtor’s ability to seek a fresh financial start through bankruptcy is constitutionally protected. Therefore, courts routinely invalidate restrictions designed to limit a debtor’s ability to file a voluntary bankruptcy petition as void against public policy. Nevertheless, it is not uncommon for a business entity’s governing documents to contain limitations or restrictive requirements that must be satisfied before bankruptcy protection can be sought. Oftentimes, these provisions allow a single person (or entity) to block a bankruptcy filing, whether by holding a “golden share” or simply by withholding consent. How to harmonize a debtor’s right to file against a creditor’s desire to protect its financial interests in that debtor has sparked a number of different judicial opinions.
A recent decision from U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge David Cleary for the Northern District of Illinois addresses this issue head on and found that filing restrictions aren’t always per se violative. See, In re 301 W. North Avenue, Case No. 24 B 2741 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Jan. 6, 2025). Cleary’s decision suggests that when certain protections for the debtor are in place, limitations imposed by creditors on seeking bankruptcy relief are permissible.
Debtor 301 W. North Avenue LLC (301 W. North or the debtor) owned a seven-story apartment building in Chicago with a $30 million business mortgage. As part of the loan package, the lender specifically required that 301 W. North have one independent manager that was acceptable to the lender, and that the entity be “bankruptcy remote.” As a result, 301 W. North entered into an LLC agreement (the LLC agreement), which required that it maintain a board consisting of two managers, including an independent manager satisfactory to the lender who would remain in place as long as the mortgage debt remained outstanding.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A Q&A with conference speaker Ryan Phelan, a partner at Marshall, Gerstein & Borun and founder and moderator of legal blog PatentNext, to discuss how courts and jurisdictions are handling novel technologies, the copyrightability of AI-assisted art, and more.
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.