Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

How Prepared Are You for Trump 2.0’s Worksite Enforcement Regime?

By Richard S. Hartunian and Jacqueline C. Wolff and Kaela M. Athay
March 31, 2025

Prior to the election, Tom Homan, a previous Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official under both President Obama and President Trump and the President’s new border czar, vowed that President Trump would “restart workplace enforcement.” See,What to know about Tom Homan, the former ICE head returning as Trump’s ‘border czar’,” NPR (Nov. 11, 2024); ICE.gov. As the first months of the new administration have demonstrated, President Trump fully intends to deliver on that campaign promise. Employers should prepare now to confirm their employees are authorized to work and have robust compliance policies and procedures in place should ICE come knocking.

What Is Worksite Enforcement?

Worksite enforcement encompasses efforts undertaken by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) through ICE and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) to enforce provisions of the immigration laws that prohibit the employment of unauthorized workers. See,Immigration-Related Worksite Enforcement: Performance Measures,” Congress.gov (06/23/15). These prohibitions, set forth in Section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), make it unlawful for an employer to:

  • Knowingly hire, recruit, or refer for a fee for employment an unauthorized worker;
  • Hire someone without complying with the employment verification process described in the INA; and
  • Knowingly continue to employ someone who is unauthorized to work.
8 U.S.C. §1324a(a)(1)-(2).

Worksite enforcement efforts also include criminal enforcement for violations such as engaging in “a pattern or practice” of hiring, recruiting or referring unauthorized aliens for employment (8 U.S.C. §1324a(f)(1)), harboring (which prohibits, among other things, “any person” from concealing, harboring, or shielding from detection someone in “knowing or [] reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law,” 8 U.S.C. §1324(a)(1)(A)(iii)); or substandard wage or working conditions. See, Worksite Enforcement investigations soar in FY18,” ICE.gov. Frequently the government will use the “catchall” false statement statute (18 U.S.C. §1001) to prosecute false statements made in documents submitted to federal agencies.
Worksite enforcement may also lead to the arrest, detention, and deportation of employees who are suspected of violating immigration laws, including by lacking proper work authorization.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.