Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Real Property Law

By New York Real Estate Law Reporter Staff
March 31, 2025

Buyer Entitled to Specific Performance

Hogan v. Bullock
2024 WL 5160754
AppDiv, Third Dept.
(Opinion by Fisher, J.)

In an action by contract vendee for specific performance of a sale contract, both parties appealed from Supreme Court’s order denying contract vendee’s summary judgment motion but requiring seller to return contract vendee’s deposit. The Appellate Division modified to grant contract vendee’s summary judgment motion, holding that seller breached by insisting on performance of conditions the contract did not require.
In 2019, seller obtained a permit from the Adirondack Park Agency (APA) authorizing subdivision of seller’s 4.7 acre parcel to create a new parcel then occupied by a garage. The permit authorized construction of a single-family residence within the garage’s footprint, and provided that for any deed conveying either of the two parcels, an access easement would be grated for each lot to make shared use of a driveway that straddled the boundary line. In 2021, contract vendee hired an engineering firm to study the feasibility of building a home with a 5500 square foot footprint on the garage lot, and then contracted to buy that lot for $775,000. Contract vendee paid a $50,000 deposit. The contract provided that if contract vendee sought to connect a driveway to the existing shared driveway, “access” would be limited to one house, and if a second house were constructed, contract vendee would pursue access from the main road to both houses. Before closing, seller forwarded a proposed deed granting contract vendee a license to use the shared driveway which “shall be extinguished” of contract vendee were to build a second house on the lot. Seller denied contract vendee’s request to change the language to create an easement rather than a license. Contract vendee then declared time of the essence and scheduled a new closing date, requiring the new proposed deed to include an easement. Seller did not agree and failed to submit any closing date. Contract vendee then agreed to provide a curb cut to connect his driveway directly to the main road to facilitate an immediate closing, but seller did not respond. Contract vendee then brought an action for specific performance and moved for summary judgment. Supreme Court concluded that there was no valid contract and dismissed the specific performance claim but required seller to return the deposit. Both parties appealed.
In holding that contract vendee was entitled to summary judgment, the Appellate Division relied on the language of the APA permit requiring an easement for any deed to either of the subdivide parcels. The court concluded that in light of the permit language, the contract required grant of an easement to contract vendee. Moreover, the court noted that while the contract required contract vendee to pursue direct access if contract vendee built a second house, in this case contract vendee offered to provide direct access. As a result, seller had no basis for refusing to close on the contract.

*****

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.