The use of AI does not alter fundamental obligations of accuracy, reasonableness and accountability. The legal risk lies not in the existence of hallucinations but in the failure to govern and verify them.
March 31, 2026Kevin Szczepanski
The Court held that intent is required and that mere awareness of infringement does not establish secondary liability.
March 31, 2026Benjamin West Janke and Ashley E. White and Jeremy D. Ray and Scott JohnsonIf you want sustainable revenue growth, you cannot treat rainmaking as a personality trait. You must treat it as a professional discipline — one that is intentionally developed through structured partner development based on a proven framework.
March 31, 2026Yuliya LaRoeLaw firms often approach executive staff hiring with a fraction of that rigor they spend on recruiting partners and laterals. The result is a category of mistake that is expensive, slow to surface, and entirely preventable.
March 31, 2026Jonathan FriedmanThis article discusses two recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions that suggest courts may be seeking to rein in the use of these financial tools of criminal and civil enforcement.
March 31, 2026Elkan Abramowitz and Jonathan SackThis article discusses consideration that should be given to guaranties in connection with loan modifications and effective methods for protecting the enforceability of a guaranty in the face of loan modifications.
March 31, 2026Jeffrey B. Steiner and Scott A. Weinberg and Joel C. HaimsThe Court of Appeals' narrow construction in Coalition for Fairness in Soho and Noho, Inc. v. City of New York of the United States Supreme Court’s unconstitutional conditions doctrine raises questions about how the Supreme Court’s exaction-takings jurisprudence should be applied within the state.
March 31, 2026Stewart E. SterkOn Dec. 1, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Cox Communications Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment. The case turned on whether Internet Service Providers could be “contributorily liable for copyright infringement, when the provider knew that specific subscribers were using its service to flagrantly infringe and continued to supply those repeat infringers with service.”
March 31, 2026Stan SoocherA recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), United States v. Heppner, has generated outsized commentary suggesting that the use of generative AI tools may jeopardize attorney-client privilege. A closer reading shows something far less dramatic.
March 01, 2026Shawn. C. Helms and Caitlin (Cate) Howe and Jason Krieser and Joseph EvansThe modern attorney–client relationship contains an implicit clause: one that demands trust, relationship intelligence and intentional engagement. Neglect it, and even exceptional legal work may not be enough to retain the “forever client.”
March 01, 2026Dr. Nakia Hall
