Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

Unseating Inelegant Notions of Product Design Functionality Image

Unseating Inelegant Notions of Product Design Functionality

Jonathan E Moskin

In Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. Herman Miller, Inc., the 9th Circuit considered whether or not the or not the best-selling piece of furniture ever is functional.

Features

Hot Legal Litigation Topics for Advertisers and Marketers in 2020 Image

Hot Legal Litigation Topics for Advertisers and Marketers in 2020

Kyle-Beth Hilfer

The COVID-19 pandemic pushed brands headlong into e-commerce. Certain advertising and marketing practices led to litigation in 2020. Brands and their legal counsel should target these hot topics for legal vetting and risk mitigation as we move forward into 2021.

Columns & Departments

IP News Image

IP News

Howard Shire & Shaleen J. Patel

NY District Court Adds to Confusion Surrounding Embedding Federal Circuit Rules Patent Infringement Under Hatch-Waxman Act Occurs Where ANDA Is Filed

Features

To Embed, or Not to Embed, that is the Question Image

To Embed, or Not to Embed, that is the Question

Shaleen J. Patel & Mike Hobbs

Would Shakespeare Post Hamlet on Instagram in 2020? Recent legal and procedural developments associated with the ubiquitous Instagram social media site have created significant practical and legal risks for both copyright owners and account holders.

Features

Marking, Notice and Knowledge: What Patent Licensors Need to Know Image

Marking, Notice and Knowledge: What Patent Licensors Need to Know

Brenda Holmes

A patentee should consider patent marking issues when negotiating a patent license, as well as during the term of the license. Otherwise, the patentee may find that its damages for patent infringement are limited due to its licensee's failure to mark.

Features

Recently Introduced Bill Would Limit ITC 'Domestic Industry by Subpoena' Image

Recently Introduced Bill Would Limit ITC 'Domestic Industry by Subpoena'

Robert Maier

Patent infringement disputes in the United States are not only heard in district courts. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) also decides high-stakes intellectual property disputes — with the remedy for the IP rights holder not being damages, but rather an exclusion order that can block a competitor's importation of infringing articles into the U.S. That remedy can be incredibly powerful for companies engaged in stiff competition in the U.S. market.

Columns & Departments

IP News Image

IP News

Jeff Ginsberg & George Soussou

Federal Circuit: HP Not Estopped from Challenging Claims Deemed Unchallengeable in IPR That It Had Joined Federal Circuit: A New Process Does Not Transform an Old Product Into a New One

Features

Are Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissals In Copyright Infringement Lawsuits In Danger? Image

Are Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissals In Copyright Infringement Lawsuits In Danger?

Alan Friedman

Until recently, the Second and Ninth Circuits have both been receptive to dismissals under Rule 12(b)(6) if the court determines the plaintiff cannot plausibly state a claim of copyright infringement because the two works are not substantial similar. However, a pair of recent "unpublished" Ninth Circuit reversals involving prominent motion pictures stand in contrast to a recent Second Circuit decision affirming such a dismissal.

Features

Deciphering the USPTO's Material Alteration Standard for Amending Marks Image

Deciphering the USPTO's Material Alteration Standard for Amending Marks

Chris Bussert

As brands mature over time, their owners often seek to update marks that are subject to a federal registration or registration application. In some cases, the impetus for the amendment may be deliberately to freshen, tweak, or otherwise modernize the subject mark. In other cases, brand owners may recognize after the fact that their current usage of a mark does not match the mark as originally registered or applied for.

Features

Testing for Genericness After USPTO v. Booking.com Image

Testing for Genericness After USPTO v. Booking.com

Alex Simonson

In the recent U.S. Supreme Court case of USPTO v. Booking.com, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the term Booking.com is not necessarily generic merely because it is composed of two components, each itself generic. In so deciding, Justice Ginsburg averred that there is an appropriate metric to determine if such a term is indeed generic, that of consumer perception.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES