Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

Interpreting Court's 'Grokster' Ruling In Light of 'Napster' Case Precedent Image

Interpreting Court's 'Grokster' Ruling In Light of 'Napster' Case Precedent

Stan Soocher

The recent ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California upholding the distribution of decentralized peer-to-peer file-sharing software has made the entertainment industry's legal battle to eliminate the free exchange of content over the Internet seem even more insurmountable. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster Ltd., 01-08541. While industry executives tout a silver lining in District Judge Stephen V. Wilson's finding that consumers commit direct copyright infringement by using such technology, this nevertheless is the first major ruling against the entertainment business on the file-sharing issue. The odds on the entertainment industry prevailing on appeal are tight because the district court relied primarily on distinguishing the Ninth Circuit's holding in A & M Records Inc. v. Napster Inc. But a close look at Grokster provides some useful ideas for the entertainment industry to consider in its fight.

Features

Bit Parts Image

Bit Parts

Stan Soocher

Recent developments in entertainment law.

TVT vs. Def Jam Provides Tips On Evidence Use Image

TVT vs. Def Jam Provides Tips On Evidence Use

Stan Soocher

On March 21, a Manhattan federal jury ruled that the Island Def Jam Music Group (IDJ) committed breach of contract, copyright infringement and fraud over TVT Records plans to release an album by hip-hop producer Irv Gotti featuring Ja Rule and his group Cash Murda Click (CMC). (TVT alleged that IDJ wrongfully prevented Gotti from delivering a CMC album for a November 2002 release date.

Courthouse Steps Image

Courthouse Steps

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recently filed cases in entertainment law, straight from the steps of the Los Angeles Superior Court.

Clause & Effect Image

Clause & Effect

Stan Soocher

Parties who buy rights to produce films often sell those rights to third parties. Such assignments raise the issue of whether the third-party buyer must meet the contractual obligations that the original rights buyer owed the original rights seller.

Features

Cameo Clips Image

Cameo Clips

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent cases in entertainment law.

Features

Decision of Note: <B>Defamation Claim Reinstated Over 'Hardball' Film</B> Image

Decision of Note: <B>Defamation Claim Reinstated Over 'Hardball' Film</B>

Stan Soocher

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has reinstated a lawsuit alleging that a youth-baseball coach may have been defamed by the movie 'Hardball.'

Features

Obtaining Royalty Settlement-Talk Documents In Litigation Over Loss of Legal Client Image

Obtaining Royalty Settlement-Talk Documents In Litigation Over Loss of Legal Client

Stan Soocher

In an industry of ever-changing loyalties, it's not unusual for attorneys to be concerned about keeping their entertainment clients. In some instances, lawyers may lose clients to competitors. If one lawyer sues another lawyer over such a loss, a key issue will likely be what correspondence the original lawyer can obtain in the lawsuit against the new lawyer.

Features

Recent Developments from Around the States Image

Recent Developments from Around the States

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

National cases of interest to you and your practice.

Features

National Litigation Hotline Image

National Litigation Hotline

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES