Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search


June issue in PDF format
June 09, 2004
June issue in PDF format
June 09, 2004
Recent Developments from Around the States
June 04, 2004
National cases of importance to your practice.
National Litigation Hotline
June 04, 2004
Recent cases for your review.
OK to Favor Older Employees over Younger Ones?
June 04, 2004
On Feb. 24, 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important decision concerning whether the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) prohibits employers from engaging in "reverse discrimination" by favoring older workers over younger workers. In <i>General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline</i>, the Supreme Court held that the ADEA does not prohibit employers from favoring older employers over younger ones. Because this decision resolves a conflict in various federal circuit courts of appeal, the Supreme Court's opinion eliminates any uncertainty concerning this issue at the federal level.
Harassment Action Dismissed on Foreign Sovereign Immunity Grounds
June 04, 2004
A recent Second Circuit decision clarifies the application of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), 28 U.S.C. 1602 <i>et seq.</i>, in a discrimination case filed against foreign governments and their agencies and instrumentalities.
Protecting a Company's 'Crown Jewels' Through Employee Departure Plans
June 04, 2004
Employees leave their current employers every day, presumably to pursue new and brighter career opportunities. This is especially true today, as the economy seems to be picking up pace and employers find themselves needing to expand their workforces. Inevitably, some employees will go to work for competitors of their former employers. While employees have the right to seek new and better jobs, the law is equally clear that they may not do so at the expense of their former employer's business interests.
In The Courts
June 02, 2004
National cases of interest to your practice.
Does 'Cooperation' Obscure the Truth?
June 02, 2004
Nowadays more than ever, accusations of business crime must be put to the test, since the stakes in this post-Enron era are at an all-time high for an accused company's survival and its executives' personal liberty and reputation. The way we test allegations in Anglo-American law is through the adversary system. Yet, just when it's needed the most, the adversary system is increasingly sidelined. For the public company, adversarialism may no longer be an option at all.
How to Make the SEC Disgorge Exculpatory Evidence
June 02, 2004
In the post-Enron world, the SEC is ratcheting-up the stakes in many of its cases. With millions of dollars in increased funding and hundreds of additional staff, it is bringing more cases, seeking harsher penalties, and generally litigating more aggressively. If recent press releases are indicative, it is also increasingly coordinating its civil enforcement activities with criminal investigations by the Department of Justice. As one SEC district administrator stated in a recent newspaper interview: "People are looking for heads. And we're going after them."

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Role and Responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders
    Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
    Read More ›
  • Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
    With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
    Read More ›
  • The Article 8 Opt In
    The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
    Read More ›