Coping With COPPA
January 01, 2004
While the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA) was designed to rein in commercial Web sites that target children as buyers of goods, it has caused legal difficulties for those who provide services such as camps, schools, after-school activities and sport clubs. The providers of such services must regularly wrestle with the ways they collect prospects from their sites.
Pop-Up Advertising Enjoined in Trademark Suit
January 01, 2004
A Manhattan federal judge has enjoined an Internet advertiser from delivering "pop-up" ads to visitors of a retail Web site. Contact lens retailer 1-800 Contacts Inc. requested the injunction pursuant to its suit against Internet "adware" purveyor WhenU.com for trademark infringement and unfair business practices.
Ninth Circuit Refreshes Web Trademark Law
January 01, 2004
The Playboy bunny hopped out of the nation's largest appellate court recently with a ruling that could put a wrinkle in one Internet advertising business model. The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ' with the reservations of at least one judge on the unanimous panel ' ruled that search engines are barred from displaying advertising related to trademarked search terms. In other words, you can't point customers in the direction of one company if they're searching for another.
RIAA Resumes Legal Offensive
January 01, 2004
On Jan. 21, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) announced the filing of a new round of lawsuits against 532 peer-to-peer (P2P) users in its ongoing campaign to deter illegal online trading of copyrighted music. While this is not the first round of such lawsuits directed at P2P users offering large numbers of unauthorized music files for others to download, this round is novel because the cases were filed against 532 "John Does" ' unidentified persons whom the RIAA can identify at this point only by their IP addresses. The balance of this article will briefly discuss the potential hurdles that the RIAA will face under this new strategy, and what it likely means for the long term success or failure of the industry's effort to deter unauthorized online downloading and recapture lost customers.
Net News
January 01, 2004
Recent developments in Internet law and in the Internet industry.
Indemnification and Insurance Indemnification by State Law, Charter and Contract
January 01, 2004
In addition to exculpating directors from personal liability in some cases, state corporation statutes authorize the use of corporate funds under certain circumstances to indemnify directors and officers for personal losses incurred by them in their official capacities. To varying extents, depending on the particular nature of the claim, the kinds of claims that a director may be indemnified with respect to include breach of fiduciary duty, violation of securities laws, or personal injury (<i>eg</i>, employment discrimination). Generally, the statutes require a corporation to indemnify a director for expenses incurred in the successful defense of a claim.
Recent Developments in Executive Compensation
January 01, 2004
Although executive compensation has been the subject of evolving reform for several years, the bright spotlight of public attention is now focused on this issue, due in part to the bursting of the stock market bubble, the collapse of Enron, and a number of other highly publicized corporate scandals. The image of executives enjoying excessive compensation packages as revenues and earnings decline, and stock values of the companies they manage plummet, is a dangerously common stereotype.
Is Compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley <i>de facto</i> Mandatory?
January 01, 2004
In Part One of this two-part article, the author summarized the basic requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act) and demonstrated the legitimate and increasing public interest in accountability of nonprofits. In Part Two, the discussion focuses on the extent to which compliance with Act-like corporate governance standards is, <i>de facto</i>, already required of the nonprofit sector.
<i>Ellerth/Faragher</i> Affirmative Action Defense: Resolving the Conflict
January 01, 2004
On Dec. 1, 2003, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider whether a constructive discharge caused by a supervisor's sexual harassment constitutes a tangible employment action that bars an employer from raising the defense that the employee unreasonably failed to employ the employer's procedures for preventing and correcting such conduct. In granting the Pennsylvania State Police's request for review from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit's decision in <i>Suders v. Easton</i>, 325 F.3d 432 (3d Cir. 2003), the Supreme Court has the opportunity to resolve a growing conflict among the circuit courts regarding the availability of the so-called <i>Ellerth/Faragher</i> affirmative defense in constructive discharge cases.
