Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

How to Sell a Coaching Program to Your Firm

By Phyllis Weiss Haserot
May 01, 2003

You've seen or experienced the benefits of coaching firsthand. Now you want to persuade your firm to institute a coaching program for business development and/or general professional development. How do you go about it? The best approach is one that combines rational arguments, strategic “lobbying” and appeals to the ultimate decision-makers ' in a way that best matches each individual's personal style.

Here are step-by-step guidelines for selling a coaching program to the decision-makers in your organization:

Step One: Gather data ' the basis for rational argument.

  • Find and include some anecdotes regarding the success of coaching.
  • Obtain some quotes on the cost-benefit or ROI of coaching.
  • Create a list of opportunities lost by people who couldn't convert contacts into clients.

Step Two: Undertake a needs assessment of the professionals in your organization.

  • Design a brief survey with questions about individual's desires for coaching and specific needs regarding personal and team coaching.
  • List specific coaching topics to get people's minds focused and to help them understand what the scope could be. Be sure to leave room for open-ended responses, as people may have unexpected issues that are ripe for coaching.
  • Survey the professionals in your firm. The size and culture of the firm will determine who you include: everyone; or only partners and managers; or only associates. You might even conduct a pilot survey with just one or two practice groups.
  • Consider interviewing a sample of the people surveyed.
  • Analyze responses, and prepare a report for decision-makers.

Step Three: Develop a coaching program proposal for presentation to management.

The proposal should include:

  • Objectives for, and expectations from, the coaching program.
  • A description of the coaching elements and how the program would work generally.
  • Cost estimates.
  • Program timing and time required of the professionals involved.
  • A recommendation on who does the coaching – outside or in-house professionals; you and/or others.
  • The support required for in-house professionals if they handle the coaching.

Step Four: Sell the proposal to the decision-makers.

  • Identify each decision-maker's personal style and how they like to receive information.
  • Tailor your proposal, particularly the oral presentation, to their behavioral style and psychological needs.
  • Do some individual lobbying with influentials and key decision-makers before making a group oral presentation.
  • Be clear and strong about your commitment to the program.
  • Follow up.
  • Be persistent ' go back again several times if need be, devising new angles from which to make your arguments.

The same systematic approach can be used to sell other ideas to top decision-makers. With a little organization, a lot of skill and some luck, you're on your way to introducing new programs in your firm.


Phyllis Weiss Haserot is the president of Practice Development Counsel, a business development and organizational effectiveness consulting and coaching firm, and creator of Coach-for-the-Coach. She is the author of “The Rainmaking Machine: Marketing Planning, Strategies and Management for Law Firms” (West Group). She can be reached at 212-593-1549.

You've seen or experienced the benefits of coaching firsthand. Now you want to persuade your firm to institute a coaching program for business development and/or general professional development. How do you go about it? The best approach is one that combines rational arguments, strategic “lobbying” and appeals to the ultimate decision-makers ' in a way that best matches each individual's personal style.

Here are step-by-step guidelines for selling a coaching program to the decision-makers in your organization:

Step One: Gather data ' the basis for rational argument.

  • Find and include some anecdotes regarding the success of coaching.
  • Obtain some quotes on the cost-benefit or ROI of coaching.
  • Create a list of opportunities lost by people who couldn't convert contacts into clients.

Step Two: Undertake a needs assessment of the professionals in your organization.

  • Design a brief survey with questions about individual's desires for coaching and specific needs regarding personal and team coaching.
  • List specific coaching topics to get people's minds focused and to help them understand what the scope could be. Be sure to leave room for open-ended responses, as people may have unexpected issues that are ripe for coaching.
  • Survey the professionals in your firm. The size and culture of the firm will determine who you include: everyone; or only partners and managers; or only associates. You might even conduct a pilot survey with just one or two practice groups.
  • Consider interviewing a sample of the people surveyed.
  • Analyze responses, and prepare a report for decision-makers.

Step Three: Develop a coaching program proposal for presentation to management.

The proposal should include:

  • Objectives for, and expectations from, the coaching program.
  • A description of the coaching elements and how the program would work generally.
  • Cost estimates.
  • Program timing and time required of the professionals involved.
  • A recommendation on who does the coaching – outside or in-house professionals; you and/or others.
  • The support required for in-house professionals if they handle the coaching.

Step Four: Sell the proposal to the decision-makers.

  • Identify each decision-maker's personal style and how they like to receive information.
  • Tailor your proposal, particularly the oral presentation, to their behavioral style and psychological needs.
  • Do some individual lobbying with influentials and key decision-makers before making a group oral presentation.
  • Be clear and strong about your commitment to the program.
  • Follow up.
  • Be persistent ' go back again several times if need be, devising new angles from which to make your arguments.

The same systematic approach can be used to sell other ideas to top decision-makers. With a little organization, a lot of skill and some luck, you're on your way to introducing new programs in your firm.


Phyllis Weiss Haserot is the president of Practice Development Counsel, a business development and organizational effectiveness consulting and coaching firm, and creator of Coach-for-the-Coach. She is the author of “The Rainmaking Machine: Marketing Planning, Strategies and Management for Law Firms” (West Group). She can be reached at 212-593-1549.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.