Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
San Francisco will be the site of the 16th annual conference and workshops on Law Firm Management & Economics, hosted by our Board member Joel A. Rose on March 20-21. Speakers and panelists will address the top-priority topics requested by surveyed participants: leadership role definition, maintaining a collegial atmosphere with accountability, setting income and production standards, dealing with under-productive partners, and helping senior partners and their transitioning clients. Workshops will be organized by firm size. For information: www.joelarose.com or 856-427-0050.
On March 26-28, Northstar Conferences presents The Law Firm CFO Institute in Coral Gables, FL. The event will focus on profitability strategies, managing and controlling debt and forecasted financial trends for 2003. Now in its seventh year, the conference is sponsored by Deloitte & Touche, AON Risk Services and Redwood Capital, and the faculty is chaired by CFOs from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe of San Francisco and Pittsburgh's Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, along with Deloitte & Touche partner J. Mark Santiago. For registration or more information, visit www.northstarconferences.com or call 212-596-6006.
San Francisco will be the site of the 16th annual conference and workshops on Law Firm Management & Economics, hosted by our Board member Joel A. Rose on March 20-21. Speakers and panelists will address the top-priority topics requested by surveyed participants: leadership role definition, maintaining a collegial atmosphere with accountability, setting income and production standards, dealing with under-productive partners, and helping senior partners and their transitioning clients. Workshops will be organized by firm size. For information: www.joelarose.com or 856-427-0050.
On March 26-28, Northstar Conferences presents The Law Firm CFO Institute in Coral Gables, FL. The event will focus on profitability strategies, managing and controlling debt and forecasted financial trends for 2003. Now in its seventh year, the conference is sponsored by
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?