Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Supreme Court of the United States has rescued Interest on Lawyers' Trust Accounts (IOLTA) programs from a vigorous constitutional attack, ruling 5'4 that states may pool clients' escrow funds in bank accounts and give the interest to legal aid programs.
The March 26 ruling was a major victory for legal aid organizations in all 50 states, which depend heavily on IOLTA. Last year, IOLTA programs, usually administered by state courts, generated more than $200 million for such programs, making them second only to the Legal Services Corp. as a funding source.
'We're pleased that this critical funding source will remain intact,' said Texas Supreme Court Justice Harriet O'Neill in a statement. 'IOLTA funding allows the poorest Texans access to basic legal services, services that are desperately needed to protect women and children from domestic violence and to provide legal assistance to the elderly who have nowhere else to turn.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?