Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Signs That Your Service Has Matured

By Mike O'Horo
June 01, 2004

In recent years, many firms have reluctantly bitten various bullets and abandoned practice areas that can no longer support their fee structures. Long before the firms' decided to get out of those businesses, though, many lawyers practicing in those areas suffered steady diminution of their earning power, professional satisfaction and internal prestige. This unnecessary human cost could have been avoided, or at least minimized, if only firms recognized sooner that the services were maturing. If they had, they would have had much more time to prepare their lawyers and ease the inevitable transition to newer, more valuable services. So, what early signs warn alert firms that a service is aging?

One sure sign is when people begin asking about fees. I don't mean questions about fees per se; all buyers need some sense of the scale of investment, ie, whether we're talking $10,000 or $100,000. That's not a maturity concern. You should be concerned, though, when the fee discussion is a comparative one, either a direct comparison to another firm's offer, or comparing you to some perceived standard. The fact that a measuring stick exists tells you that the service has matured, at least as currently configured or packaged. It doesn't mean that you abandon the service, but it does strongly suggest that it's time to re-invent it in some meaningful way to make it more valuable.

Other signs that your product/service has matured:

  • Supply exceeds demand in an evident way; sellers have little or no pricing power;
  • More purchases are by cost-focused buyers functioning as “purchasing agents”;
  • You see increasingly formal purchasing activity, eg, RFPs, beauty contests or other controlled, bid-oriented processes;
  • Buyers prefer paper to personal contact as the medium of sales communication, and are reluctant to answer your sales investigation questions because they can't see what value they would get out of the time investment (after all, they're buying a commodity);
  • The seniority level at which your service is purchased or sponsored continues dropping;
  • Everyone uses familiar, accepted terminology to describe it; it's hard to differentiate something with a vanilla name, eg, litigation, employment law.

To get relief from the margin pressure of lowest-cost procurement processes, you must find an internal end-user sponsor who will acknowledge value in your differentiation. These buyers seek personal satisfaction from using your service, in the form of greater productivity or reduced pain. Their question is: can I get my boss (the company) to pay for this value form? Help them justify the funding.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.